Blog
June 19, 2018

Is There Hope? If you have been in the country lately you would say no, but the real answer is yes!
No Comments / in From the Field / by Loomix

I have spent the last few months traveling from Texas to Montana and Nebraska to Idaho and across the board, if you talk to cow/calf producers, you will hear a common theme: Things are tough going right now. There is no doubt that is true but at the same time, I think we need to look at reality. While there are some issues and warts, there are also some gold nuggets that we can look at and utilize to show that there is hope as we go into this feed season and beyond.

First, let’s deal with the warts. If you look at Cattle Fax average prices for a 550# calf, we have seen decreases in prices from the high in December of 2014 of $289.14/cwt to a current price for the same 550# calf at $124.71/cwt. On average. That is a difference of $164.43/cwt. If we look at year over year differences, calf prices are down by $80.50/cwt from $205.21 to $124.71 comparing October 2015 to October 2016 prices. On a year over year basis, this is a decrease of over $440 per head.

By now you probably want to go curl up in a corner. Don’t do that just yet. The sky is not falling and there are a lot of factors that we can point to that show that in fact, the sky is not falling and that there are great opportunities for utilization of the products we produce and sell on a daily basis. Let’s take a look.

First, input costs are down substantially. While cattle markets are down, we can take some solace in the fact that many input costs are down in price at virtually the same percentage.

monthly-us-hay-and-corn-futures-prices-graph

Second, grazing and forage production conditions in most of our market areas have been superior this year. Fortunately, spring and summer precipitation has been above normal for most of the geography that we cover. Therefore, most cow/calf producers will be able to take advantage of increased production when it comes to winter grazing, grass hay production and CRP hay production in order to keep costs in check.

us-drought-monitor

Finally, the numbers don’t lie. There should be continued profitability for cow/calf producers that manage their operations to be efficient in production and can manage to be a “high return” or “average return” producer. Many people hear the term “high return” producer and think it means producers in these categories don’t purchase inputs for their cattle. That is not necessarily the case. While keeping costs low will be key to profitability for cow/calf producers at this point in the cattle cycle, it does not mean that we don’t have a fit with our products and nutritional programs that we provide. More on that later though, for now, let’s take a look at the reality that cow calf producers are currently dealing with.

average-cow-calf-profitloss

The above charts show past profitability and carrying costs for cow/calf producers in three different categories (High Return, Average Return and Low Return). The cow costs listed are based on a survey in 2015. If we assume costs will be similar moving forward, cash cost break-even prices for a 550# calf would range from $157.18/cwt for “low return” producers to $78.00/cwt for “high return” producers with an average break-even of $1.18/cwt on a 550# calf. So the question becomes, if that is the break-even, what can cow/calf producers expect for revenue on a 550# calf in 2017?

price-expectations

The chart above shows the expected average price and range of prices on a 550# calf for 2017 based on the Cattle-Fax Long-Term Outlook released in late July of 2016. Since then, these projections have been updated to a range of $120/cwt to $155/cwt for a 550# calf depending on the point in the seasonal cycle. Based on that, if we use $137/cwt as an average and an average production cost of $118/cwt, cow/calf producers should recognize a profit of $19/cwt or $104.50 per head. While that is not the level of profitability this segment of the industry has seen in the past year or two, it is still profitable and that is important.

So, where do we fit in all of this? As providers of supplements and nutritional programs to help maximize forage utilization, we need to realize that the products we supply fit in this market and in the current point in the cattle cycle. Whether it is Loomix or QLF products, the point is that we provide cow calf producers tools to utilize and get the most they can out of lower cost, poor quality forages while helping ensure cattle in the herd perform at a peak level of their capability.
In most cases, most spring calving herds weaning has occurred or is about to occur. We all know that most cow herds are on a schedule where right now and for the next 90 to 120 days is the most economical time to put weight on females in the herd. In fact, you could argue that the most economical and highest ROI nutritional program for cow/calf producers would be to make sure they are incorporating liquid supplementation into their feeding program right now and moving forward especially when you consider that most cow herds are still in a grazing situation on grass or may be going to crop aftermath soon. The point is, by supplementing forage at this point in the production cycle, this is one time where you can have a major impact on the productivity of the herd now, through calving and breeding and on through next year’s weaning.
I titled this article “Is there Hope?” Yes I was being facetious but I also know if you have spent much time talking to producers and even ourselves as salespeople and dealers lately, it can seem like there isn’t hope. The reality is there is hope and the time to be talking to producers about what we can provide is now, because in many ways right now is when our products and programs can have the biggest impact on the producers herds productivity and in the end, the producers profitability.

March 18, 2014

Is It Worth The Price?
No Comments / in From the Field / by Loomix

-by Dick Carlson, Colorado and Southern Wyoming District Sales Manager

Often times when visiting customers at the feedlot, dairy or ranch they confront us with questions, such as:

  • Is this feed worth the price being asked?
  • How do I determine the value of the feed source from a feed test?
  • What is important to review when I receive results from the lab?

RMR_7446_web

Regardless of whether or not feeds are expensive, we must determine the best feed for the value of a given nutrient. Whether feeding cows or feeder cattle we must put a pencil to the ration to determine the best feeds to incorporate, based

on the dollar value of that nutrient provided

to the animal. Following is a list to be used when determining which nutrients should be purchased at a particular price.

  1. Inventory feed currently available on-hand.
  2. Determine the rations needed to identify the amount of total feed required.
  3. Determine when you will feed your best and worst rations.
  4. Test your feeds to identify the nutrients lacking in those diets.
  5. Determine the best value of requireed nutrients based on dry matter.
  6. Know the cost of transporting feeds, especially wet feeds.
  7. Determine the palatability of the feed and potential waste.

Feeds cannot be compared fairly based on price alone. The lowest priced feed may not be the most economical feed in the long run. Evaluating the additional supplements your customers will need to purchase is esstential in providing what the cheap feed is not. To determine if the feed is right, first look at the dry matter cost of the particular feed.

Also, we need to determine which nutrient, such as protein or energy, the feed lacks when developing a ration for a certain group of

animals. Let’s work through a few examples.

Example 1:

Alfalfa priced at $160/ton; 18% crude protein (CP);

56 total digestible nutrients (TDN); 87% dry matter (DM).

Cost/ton of DM: $160/ton / 20 cwt / .87 = $9.20/cwt DM

Cost/pound of CP: $9.20/cwt DM / 18% CP = $0.51/lb. CP

Cost/pound of TDN: $9.20/cwt DM / 56% TDN = $0.165/lb. TDN

Comparing corn with distillers grain is a common practice, which reinforces why we need to identify the moisture and the cost of transporting that feed. Example 2 only compares moisture, but to go further protein and energy should also be compared when considering wet distillers.

Example 2:

Corn priced at $4.60/bu; Wet distillers grain delivered at $69.80/ton

Corn: $4.60/bu / 56 (lb/bu) / .845(15.5% DM) x 20 cwt = $194.42/ton

WDG: $59.80/ton + $10/ton freight / .35(35% DM) = $199.43/ton

Obviously, there are other things to consider when selecting feeds. Some may be less expensive providing a good source of scratch for the rumen but have no feed value. Therefore, the remaining diet will need to be more dense with the other essential nutrients.

Or, let’s go for adding Hay Treat and make

poor feed a

usable commodity with additional protein. Additionally,

High Fat products provide a great solution to add energy with the side benefit of conditioning the ration.

The art to using different feedstuffs, whether poor or excellent quality, is

how we make the rations all fit together and be edible. Hopefully, working through these examples reinforces the need to balance rations and help you answer those questions during visits

to feedlots, dairies and ranches.

Dick Carlson can be reached at Dick.Carlson@allianceliquidfeeds.com.